Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohit Gadia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedily deleted under criterion G11. Seraphimblade Talk to me 01:12, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Rohit Gadia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems like the author himself made a page or someone made it for him. clear no sign on notability for being a encyclopedia material or even writing a biography for such individual on Wikipedia. insignificant person, I doubt even from the same industry anyone would know him by the name. Highest degree of blatant promotions. Light2021 (talk) 21:03, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete by all means and I have speedied the company's article as it was overly blatant with advertising, the history is quite obvious with there only being contributions by that one advertising-only account, therefore it emphasizes the genuinely advertising motivations of that one user, and how the article in fact never changed and went beyond that. It's quite unfortunate this was in fact accepted in 2014, but then again, advertisements were still being kept, started and accepted at that time, so we can at least say it's finally deletion time. SwisterTwister   talk  03:07, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete ASAP non-notable person. The author is the person himself it seems like that. -Gary J. Connor (talk) 11:09, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
 * MUST BE DELETED AS SOON AS PEOPLE.......... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sashi123123 (talk • contribs) 03:28, 1 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as spam. I requested a speedy deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:41, 3 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.