Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohit Gore


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. WP:NPASR Mark Arsten (talk) 02:33, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Rohit Gore

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm having difficulty with this probable autobiography. The media mentions exist, yes, but they seem to verify the existence of the books, not in any particular manner the notability of the author, who seems to have created this article as a vehicle for self promotion. I considered CSD as spam but, in view of the particular nature of Indian media coverage, chose the AfD route for a full discussion and consensus.

The gentleman seems to be on the border of notability, but on the wrong side. I view this article as an article variant of WP:NOTYET WP:TOOSOON and failing WP:GNG. It should be deleted without prejudice to future re-creation once he is genuinely notable. I will not suggest userfication since the creating editor appears to be the gentleman concerned (0.9 probability). Fiddle  Faddle  10:18, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I think you're looking for WP:TOOSOON. Yes? Stalwart 111  10:44, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I am grateful to my learned friend, and have made the correction. Fiddle   Faddle  10:51, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:32, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:32, 14 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Given the usual difficulties of finding sources for Indian authors (see WP:INDAFD "Books") this author by comparison has many sources and would pass WP:AUTHOR #3, multiple reviews. There are also biographical sources. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 16:31, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * weak Keep There seem to be sufficient reviews for notability as an actor, cunsidering the cultural bias of finding mater, as GreenC explains above. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DGG (talk • contribs) 04:32, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 04:36, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Keep: I second Green Cardamom. --Enlightinggemini (talk) 17:30, 21 September 2013 (UTC) This user is a confirmed sockpuppet of Viii007. -- S M S  Talk 12:49, 23 September 2013 (UTC) Comment struck. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 21:46, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Wifione  Message 19:00, 28 September 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.