Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohit Kumar (actor)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  11:43, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Rohit Kumar (actor)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG, no indication of notability. Both sources are largely interview and don't give much information about him. A PROD was contested due to the page being previously deleted through PROD and re-created. JML1148 ( talk &#124; contribs ) 08:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Television,  and India. JML1148 ( talk &#124;  contribs ) 08:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Relisting comment: For some input on the sources presented above. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:47, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GNG. I think The Economic Times article is noteworthy. I also found content in The Hindu, Pune Mirror, Outlook India, etc.  APK  whisper in my ear  08:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes WP:GNG. NYC Guru (talk) 09:33, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Haryana-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:08, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Kept - Passes to prove WP:GNG, WP:NBIO and WP:ENT. Kind regrds –––Face-smile.svg Àvî Râm7 (talk)  04:28, 7 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.