Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohmert's law


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:26, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Rohmert's law

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Totally unsourced article. Appears like a piece of original research that someone wrote. Stedrick (talk) 16:22, 19 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Deletion is completely unwarranted, though it may need to be moved to a new name (I get more hits from "Rohmert curve"). The concept is a fairly important one in human biomechanics / ergonomics, and one that deserves expansion, not deletion.  The original source is https://doi.org/10.1007%2FBF00698869 and is unfortunately in German, but the paper has been cited nearly 200 times, with loads of subsequent work.  Sadly, I don't have the time to fix all the articles in the biomechanics purview, and this one is on the periphery of my personal area of knowledge, but I've added the banner for the relevant Wikiproject, and hopefully I or someone else will get to it in time. HCA (talk) 16:57, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. There are plenty of reliable references. I've added one to the article. -- 202.124.75.126 (talk) 22:26, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.