Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roida Rzayeva


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:00, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Roida Rzayeva

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nicely presented WP:RESUME of a young associate professor who does not appear in SCOPUS, written by three accounts with only one other article between them. No indication of passing WP:PROF, all references appear to be to her own work. Guy (Help!) 17:22, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Nothing significant showing on Google: Wikipedia is not Linkedin ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 19:29, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.   C Thomas3   (talk) 19:45, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions.   C Thomas3   (talk) 19:45, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:03, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:04, 22 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Only three GS citations to her work so fails WP:Prof. I can't see anything else. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:10, 22 November 2017 (UTC).
 * Delete. Grad students often have about this much output on publications. No secondary references are included in the article as only the subject's own publications were used as references for the Selected Publications section. Kingofaces43 (talk) 23:08, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete not a notable academic.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:25, 25 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.