Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rojo.com (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Six Apart. Tone 13:01, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Rojo.com
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable website, no sources, and defunct for quite some time. A defunct site is not likely to gain new sources. Miami33139 (talk) 02:59, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:15, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Probably speedy G4. Niteshift36 (talk) 19:45, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect. No reason to delete (or nominate) when parent company Six Apart references explicitly.  Close AfD at will with redirect. &there4; here&hellip;&spades; 07:45, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.