Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rok Studios (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. A clear consensus to keep following relisting and the withdrawal of the nomination and switch to keep. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:54, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Rok Studios
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject of the article fails WP:GNG. I can't find any evidence of notability. The sources provided are unreliable and majority of the sources are self-published material with no credible editorial oversight. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 08:27, 12 January 2016 (UTC) Nomination withdrawn to Keep per — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikicology (talk • contribs) 07:13, 26 January 2016‎
 * Thank you for your withdrawing and supporting a "keep".   Schmidt,  Michael Q. 01:09, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 08:32, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 08:32, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 08:32, 12 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete for now at best and draft and userfy if needed as none of this suggests a better solidly notable article. Notifying 1st AfDers, , and .  SwisterTwister   talk  08:35, 12 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep (upping from my "weak keep" at the last AFD) as topic is getting more coverage of late in acceptable sources, not less.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 11:45, 12 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 11:47, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Onel 5969  TT me 13:07, 20 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, jcc (tea and biscuits) 21:27, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - same as before. Coverage appears to be expanding enough to meet WP:GNG. VMS Mosaic (talk) 06:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per MichaelQSchmidt passes WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 02:26, 1 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.