Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roksana Ciurysek-Gedir


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  14:52, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Roksana Ciurysek-Gedir

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (biographies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:Connorcp (creator) with the following rationale "(sourced additional content)". While new sources are always good, I am afraid they fail to address my concerns. This article is still based primarily on two interviews, and few mentions in passing/press releases/resumes/self-published sources. I don't think the subject is notable as an artist, or a businessperson. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:17, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  —AE  ( talk  •  contributions ) 11:07, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  —AE  ( talk  •  contributions ) 11:07, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.  —AE  ( talk  •  contributions ) 11:07, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions.  —AE  ( talk  •  contributions ) 11:07, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  —AE  ( talk  •  contributions ) 11:07, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  —AE  ( talk  •  contributions ) 11:07, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete sources are very minor or passing mentions or biographies. I removed one that was a Shopify shopping site. Fails notability tests.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 01:17, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:GNG with flying colors. Added a Forbes reference written about her when she returned to Poland after a 20 year career in finance in London. She attracted media attention at a fairly young age and it has continued because she is someone interesting to read about with her career in both finance and arts. Sydney Poore/FloNight&#9829;&#9829;&#9829;&#9829; 03:39, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * When your best source is a WP:INTERVIEW, we are hardly talking about flying colors. Since most of that article are her quotes, with a spattering of quotes of her friends and coworkers, I think this is not a very good source, sorry. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:57, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - Clearly not a very notable individual, but I think this person scrapes through. There are couple "reasonabl-y" looking Polish language sources available for her in addition to the ones already listed. As the nom points out, none of these sources are particularly "high-quality", but I think this might be a place that quantity makes up for lack of quality. NickCT (talk) 14:05, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Atlantic306 (talk) 19:54, 17 September 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. No highest-level positions in banking; no major exhibitions or works in museums as artists\ " someone interesting to read about with her career in both finance and arts." is meaningless unless at least one of the careers are notable . There are some interviews, none of which are usable as a RS for anything, since she says whatever she cases to. All that Forbes reference shows is that she has a Press Agent.  DGG ( talk ) 16:00, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg  jhp  jm  01:18, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. per nom and DGG.Fails WP:GNG.Upcoming at best.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:25, 3 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.