Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rokugan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Legend of the Five Rings. Liz Read! Talk! 03:45, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Rokugan

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I am afraid this fictional entity fails WP:GNG. My BEFORE failed to locate anything that is not a plot summary. Redirect to Lo5R (parent game) is probably best we can do here? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 21:42, 11 August 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: I'm relisting this discussion as both Merge and Redirect had advocates and more than one redirect target was favored. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:05, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy,  and Games. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  21:42, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Legend of the Five Rings (collectible card game) or Legend of the Five Rings per nom, merging the second ref possibly. There is no RS that indicates SIGCOV, ref 1 is non-RS and ref 2 seems to be a trivial mention. VickKiang (talk) 00:58, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge to Legend of the Five Rings, but only the sourced content in the "History" section. Reliable sources found in searches are generally on the Legend of the Five Rings and the various games using that setting as a whole, and just briefly discuss the nitty-gritty of the actual fictional empire of Rokugan in a passing manner as part of the overall discussion of the topic. For example, the various reviews and previews of the very recently released Adventures in Rokugan book mention the empire as the setting, but don't go into the kind of detail that would require splitting it out into a separate article. Outside of the "History" section, this current article is nothing but unsourced, in-universe plot summary that should not be merged. Rorshacma (talk) 01:42, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect - The topic doesn't appear to have any potential to meet GNG at this time. Merging the sourced content makes sense. TTN (talk) 17:41, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Redirect to Legend of the Five Rings to form a consensus. Verifiable information can be added through normal editing. Shooterwalker (talk) 19:25, 19 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.