Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roland Peter Savage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. If more sources "comes to light" we can reconsider but this is a BLP and it can't be in article space without them. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:18, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Roland Peter Savage

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable. Yutsi Talk/  Contributions  17:22, 21 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - No coverage in reliable sources, and the album that he supposedly best known for has no coverage either. -- Whpq (talk) 17:46, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - no indicators for any notability.  Dewritech (talk)  18:22, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:18, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: unsourced and fails WP:Music. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 09:31, 22 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Note to Admin: On Jan 21, an anon altered the AFD notice in the article to point to Articles for deletion/Roland Savage causing one editor to place their comments in the wrong place.  I have copied the comments below.  I don't know of that page should be immediately deleted or what should be done with it.  I have corrected the AFD notice in the article to point here. -- Whpq (talk) 12:27, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Since you already copied the only comment on that AfD over here, I placed a G6 speedy tag on it and removed it from the 24 January log (where I stumbled across it in the first place). &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 15:25, 24 January 2011 (UTC)


 * There is a Peter Savage who produces music which could be an evolution of the music described in this article. see http://www.last.fm/music/Peter+Savage/absence+of+presence . There is no link to this person listed so he may be reclusive and hard to find. That would tally with comments made in support of delletion but I think mitigates against deletion as more information may come to light to verify the page. So maybe hold off deletion?? Martinationaustralia (talk) 10:28, 22 January 2011 (UTC) — Martinationaustralia (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.