Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Role Players Creed


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Staxringold talkcontribs 07:12, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Role Players Creed

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. No secondary coverage or any other sort of evidence of notability. Fails WP:N and should therefore be deleted. Percy Snoodle (talk) 18:46, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Wyatt Riot (talk) 19:25, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions.  —Percy Snoodle (talk) 08:12, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The nom is incorrect, there are plenty of secondary sources. I was surprised by how many hits it had. But none of them seemed to meet our definition of a reliable source so for now it will need to be deleted.  Once we see coverage in reliable sources (and I fully expect to see this referenced in books and magazine articles at some point) the article can be recreated. Hobit (talk) 12:10, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I see plenty of repeats but little to no real discussion - sources but not coverage. Percy Snoodle (talk) 13:10, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I saw a fair number of blog posts discussing. Neither here nor there, they don't count for WP:N. Hobit (talk) 13:16, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Percy Snoodle (talk) 13:25, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:42, 21 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete I created the article and than tried to show that it met WP:N, which of course is backward logic. My mistake.--Kthapelo (talk) 02:17, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:N. Nada in Gnews, Gscholar. There are as many creeds as there are role players. Ray  Talk 19:18, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.