Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roll a D6


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. The consensus below is that the sources are sufficient to meet the GNG. Eluchil404 (talk) 23:17, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Roll a D6

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Irrilevant parody that has never been sent to retailers; all the information about it can be found in Like a G6. There may be sources but imo a four-lines page about a parody like this should be deleted after it's been merged into the main article.  ×º°”˜ `”°º× ηυηzια  ×º°”˜ `”°º×  13:17, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 23 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep The information is in Like a G6 because someone did a copy and paste merge because they didn't like the article. The parody has been covered by CBS, Forbes and Greeley Tribune (via a lexus nexus hit). This article has already been attempted to be deleted several times because its not normal wikipedia fare. Indeed most things like this shouldn't be on wiki. However, this article seems to have enough sources. I will run another Lexus-nexus search tonight to look for more sources --Guerillero &#124; My Talk  17:47, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Some more links: Greeley Tribune (mentioned above), Reverb (part of the Denver Post), Ology (an online magazine) --Guerillero &#124; My Talk  18:04, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets the WP:GNG requirements, as it has significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. —Torchiest talkedits 20:00, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per Torchiest. BOZ (talk) 23:24, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - It has four reliable third party sources, that's sadly more than average for Wikipedia, and it meets the GNG in spades.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  03:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep In part because AfD should be for deletion and even the nominator suggests merging the content rather than deleting. Also, meets GNG. (Note: I came here after reading Guerillero's RfA.) Mark Arsten (talk) 04:35, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.