Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roller coaster tycoon 4


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tan  &#124;   39  14:26, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Roller coaster tycoon 4

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:CRYSTAL \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 05:48, 13 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak delete True. But I did find this using Google Search India. Yes, that's right Google India. Don't use any other search engine. Only Google India.-- The LegendarySky Attacker 05:55, 13 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: Mm, but I could make that clipart up in about an hour; neither a reliable source nor information of any kind does that make.   RGTraynor  06:15, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to RollerCoaster Tycoon (series). Nothing verifiable in the article, and even if it was there is nowhere near enough information for a standalone article yet. As it stands, the article only just scrapes past an A1 (no context) speedy deletion. Thryduulf (talk) 11:44, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 11:44, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 11:44, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect, enough speculation appears to exist to make this worth guiding in the right direction. Not that I think anyone searching for RC4 will find anything usefull at RollerCoaster Tycoon (series) but redirects are cheap. Usrnme h8er (talk · contribs) 12:26, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as pure speculation. From Google's translation of German PC Games: "The fans have to wait: Atari has no Roller Coaster Tycoon 4 - and also the opportunities for transport Tycoon 2 is not good." Opposing redirect on the same grounds. — Rankiri (talk) 15:49, 13 July 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.