Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rolling Hills Prep School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:57, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Rolling Hills Prep School

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails: WP:ORG with no independent sources. Was created by the school itself (user is now blocked) potently as an advertisement. Wintonian (talk) 23:29, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  —Arxiloxos (talk) 00:19, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Despite the COI, that doesn't make it a bad topic. News articles are easily found, this book mention is not insignificant, the school is accredited, and the profile at National Center for Education Statistics indicates it isn't exactly a tiny school. (note the "enrollment by grade" is obviously shifted by several grades; NCES isn't always accurate with that). I haven't researched things from ca.gov, but I'm sure it's all there too. While Notability (schools) is a failed proposal, it's a fairly universal consensus, especially when information about the school is easy to find. tedder (talk) 00:57, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per tedder. Plenty of coverage backs up the usual "keep" presumption per the criteria and reasoning stated at WP:HS/N.--Arxiloxos (talk) 01:22, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - not only contains a high school, but there are sufficient sources to allow the page to be nicely expanded. TerriersFan (talk) 03:11, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - many reliable sources available as shown by tedder. --TorriTorri(Talk to me!) 21:05, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.