Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rolling Stone Queen of Pop Index


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 03:09, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Rolling Stone Queen of Pop Index

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:N as no coverage in third-party sources. There have been many other lists and polls of 'Queen of Pop' throughout the years., there's no really significance for this Rolling Stone article to warrant a standalone article. Bluesatellite (talk) 23:59, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete — Irrelevant list that fails among other policies, the notability. --Apoxyomenus (talk) 01:50, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:05, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:05, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:05, 2 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete No indication of notability per WP:GNG. HĐ (talk) 04:40, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Unless there is third-party recognition of this ranking outside of Rolling Stone's own pages--and none is in evidence---this has no business being on wikipedia. ShelbyMarion (talk) 14:26, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: per above. Alcremie (talk) 09:59, 5 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.