Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rolustech


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:25, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Rolustech

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Although I'll admit that this is not my area of expertise, I did a quick WP:BEFORE search and couldn't find much outside the usual social media websites, database listings and primary sources. In my view, this does not satisfy WP:NCORP or WP:SIRS. It is not currently mentioned at Salesforce so I'm not sure that a redirect or merge to Salesforce would be appropriate. Spiderone 12:30, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  12:30, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  12:30, 10 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The links of Salesforce and California wikipedia pages have been removed. The referencing is not used from social media websites nor found primary sources used in citation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sleepyfish45 (talk • contribs) 13:53, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
 * As per WP:SIRS, is there anything like this available for this company:

Examples of substantial coverage that would generally be sufficient to meet the requirement:


 * A news article discussing a prolonged controversy regarding a corporate merger,
 * A scholarly article, a book passage, or ongoing media coverage focusing on a product or organization,
 * A documentary film exploring environmental impact of the corporation's facilities or products,
 * An encyclopedia entry giving an overview of the history of an organization,
 * A report by a consumer watchdog organization on the safety of a specific product,
 * An extensive how-to guide written by people wholly independent of the company or product Spiderone  13:59, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  14:01, 10 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete: I probably would have nominated for speedy deletion as WP:A7. None of the sources in the article are reliable and independent of the subject. Google search of Rolustech brings up press release sources and articles that have been posted by people associated with the company.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 16:26, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
 * That's fair enough. I wasn't sure if the fact that they operate in 3 countries might be deemed to be an 'indication of importance'. I never quite know what is blatant enough for A7 or not, really. Spiderone  16:40, 10 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - blatantly promotional, fails WP:MILL. Rogermx (talk) 22:47, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete agree with nominator. no significant coverage. Expertwikiguy (talk) 09:29, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Thirteen-in-a-dozen software VAR, zero notability, and zero encyclopaedic value. There's a reason why no serious secondary coverage is cited in the article. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:13, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. This could have been speedied, since it doesn't cite anything resembling a reliable source... there isn't even the usual forbes profile.  FalconK (talk) 03:53, 17 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.