Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roma Victor

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was no consensus; thus, the article is kept. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 18:09, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)

Roma Victor
Premature article on an as-yet unreleased game. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 17:04, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Beta-testing isn't particularly immature to make a topic; it's slated to come out next quarter. A Google search turns up 82,700 hits. Keep --SpiritGlyph 18:01, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * User's fifth edit. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 18:09, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. No less deserving of an article than the other MMORPG's. Had this been nominated back in July I would have agreed. Xezbeth  18:00, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Software should be in stable release at minimum. For my two cents, games probably need to be in first version release AND have a substantial following, but that's just IMO. HyperZonktalk 18:04, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Come back when a full stable version is released. Zzyzx11 19:18, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not yet notable. Fully concur with HyperZonk.  Barno 19:37, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Betas are not inherently non-notable. ICQ had many many millions of users when it was still a beta.  Subject has 81,500 Google hits and plenty of press coverage already. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  20:57, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, but with reservations. Article needs expansion. Megan1967 23:50, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep seems to be well known- SimonP 01:02, Mar 6, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, games in beta aren't guarenteed release--nixie 02:50, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete until released and significant. All information pre-release is inherently unverifiable.  (Okay, that's a sweeping generalization but it's true far more often than not and definitely applies here.)  Rossami (talk) 00:51, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Borderline keep - reads like an ad, but the Google count shows interest - David Gerard 15:37, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - It's in closed beta, but is still a popular up-and-comer.
 * Only edit by 65.33.200.125. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 18:09, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Totally agree with Xezbeth - this title has been in development for over four years - seems silly to delete it when its release is imminent. Orcus  18:00, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * Only edit by 80.7.230.156; it was actually at 18:39, Mar 14, 2005. Orcus has two edits, both on May 29, 2003.  &mdash;Korath (Talk) 18:09, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. No less deserving of an article than the other MMORPG's. The game is running a lot better and besides whats that have to do with them wanting to delete the wiki info on it? &mdash;MrDDT

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.