Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romain Gauthier (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:09, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Romain Gauthier
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Reason from removed prod by User:Wkharrisjr was: "Stub for a commercial entity. Flagged as non-notable for three years with no additional information added." Illia Connell (talk) 15:47, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment One editor in an AfD discussion (resulting in deletion) on the French Wikipedia pointed to this Reuters article, though it looks like a passing mention. AllyD (talk) 20:13, 19 November 2012 (UTC) I've added a couple of references into the article text; others mentioned in the previous AfD are now dead-links. AllyD (talk) 20:29, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:42, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:42, 20 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley   Huntley  00:09, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Keep I added more references and information, although it is still a stub. It's hardly promotional; this isn't the kind of stuff you buy at Sears. People who buy it already know about it, and they're probably not finding out from Wikipedia. Rather, this person is a well-covered watchmaker, as evidenced by at the very least this, plus in the other references he's praised for his engineering techniques. This bio passes at least WP:GNG. § FreeRangeFrog 02:16, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley (public)  talk   00:06, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  talk to me! 09:13, 10 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep given the new references; he's not highly notable, but he's not nn so far as I can determine. Not written as an ad; and as FreeRangeFrog, Wikipedia would hardly be a suitable venue for that type of product anyway. Killer Chihuahua 10:22, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. References establish it is a unique product. Article could use more explanation why these products are unique (although would need to carefully avoid WP:PROMO). 1292simon (talk) 01:15, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.