Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roman (typeface)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Roman type. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:12, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Roman (typeface)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unsourced article that does not establish notability as per WP:N -- Liliana-60 (talk) 14:35, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 18 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:N unless someone adds references. There are a number of poorly referenced typeface articles in the various categories below . – Pnm (talk) 17:22, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Simply Redirect to Roman type (which contains the phrase "roman typeface"). --Lambiam 19:17, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 02:01, 26 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Roman type per Lambiam. This is a viable search term for the article, and until this particular font is notability, the redirect would be more appropriate.  I, Jethrobot  drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 23:07, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I've no problem with a redirect instead of delete. Seems like these articles are about the same topic. – Pnm (talk) 03:57, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.