Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roman Adunka


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 00:13, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Roman Adunka

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

A user contested the PROD with the rationale 'Plays in "The Austrian Football Bundesliga" which "is the highest-ranking national league club competition in Austrian football" according to WP articles, so passes WP:ATHLETE'. However, he has played no games so he fails ATHLETE, and there are no sources about him except squad profiles so he fails WP:GNG. Delete as nominator. -- Big  Dom  18:21, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * As the user who contested the PROD, if he's not actually played in any games for his team at that level, then go ahead and un-AfD and re-PROD the article. However, how come he's part of the team if he doesn't play for them, please? --Arkelweis (talk) 19:58, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, he is part of the team, but he's a young player who hasn't made any first team appearances yet so unfortunately he fails WP:ATHLETE. I can't un-AfD it now, we'll have to see what others want to do with the article on here. -- Big  Dom  20:42, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * 'no-rePRODing' is to stop multiple attempts to PROD an article after it's been demonstrated that it's deletion is contentious (by having the PROD removed): if the original dePRODder withdraws their de-PROD, then i'd say this is a case for 'ignoring all rules' and just unAfDing it and putting the PROD back up, as the PROD is no longer contentious; however, someone has !voted 'keep', so I guess it makes sence to go through with the AfD. --Arkelweis (talk) 13:11, 14 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - he's not played in the Austrian Bundesliga, therefore he's not notable. (@ Arkelweis - after an article's been dePRODded, it can't be rePRODded.) DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) | (talk to me) | (What I've done)  22:17, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, for now. He is listed on the squad and has been covered in local sport news .  That seems good enoguh for me; a situation comparable to an NFL rookie who has been drafted and signed but not yet started.  If he leaves without an app, Id gladly change my vote. Mystache (talk) 22:27, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. GiantSnowman 12:45, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE as he hasn't yet played in a game. "Local sports news" isn't enough, as that fails both WP:GNG and WP:NTEMP. Oh, and saying "leave him in case he plays" violates WP:CRYSTALBALL. GiantSnowman 12:47, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * however, as it seems that he may well become notable, if the result is 'delete' can we instead 'archive' somewhere, as we may well have justification in recreating the article later? --Arkelweis (talk) 13:11, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * All deleted articles are automatically archived to a place from which an admin can retrieve them if required...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:25, 14 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete- per DitzyNizzy and GiantSnowman. Eddie6705 (talk) 13:01, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - hasn't played first team football Spiderone  13:20, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE Steve-Ho (talk) 19:16, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.