Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roman Packo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 22:45, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Roman Packo

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Tagged for notability since its creation with a comment on the talk page essentially stating that it would be unlikely to survive an AfD. Only the top tier of Slovakia is listed at WP:FPL and all of the sources confirm that he has never played in the top tier, so WP:NFOOTBALL is not met. GSA also confirms this. The only substantial coverage seems to be from FK Pohronie's own website, which is an unacceptable source as it is neither reliable nor independent of Packo. Clubs at all levels, professional and amateur, write articles on their own players; this does not make them notable. A Slovakian source search and Google searches came back with very little. The sources that were relevant were all sorely lacking in depth: see Dobrenoviny, CAS and Dnes24. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Slovakia-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:41, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 19:35, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG, and a clear WP:BEFORE has been done. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:48, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Without prejudice to change vote to Keep if significant coverage is later found. For my search, I was unable to find WP:SIGCOV for the subject, noting that someone with searching skills for Slovak/Czech sources might uncover things I was unable to. Until that point, my vote stands as delete. GauchoDude (talk) 14:29, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Paul Vaurie (talk) 04:11, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The individual appears to fail WP:NBASIC in addition to WP:NSOCCER from the sourcing I can find. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:48, 7 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.