Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roman Ships


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The sources provided are apparently insufficient. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:21, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Roman Ships

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Band with questionable notability-no reliable sources either Wgolf (talk) 00:59, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, and that article could be something ya know, roman potentially. Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  02:47, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

This is my band. See I am in the process of setting up the page. Is there a problem with what is up so far? 21-gattinara-24 (talk) 13:55, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Thank you for contributing and engaging in discussion, 21-gattinara-24. Wikipedia policy requires that subjects have received substantial coverage in reliable sources that are independent from the subject. For bands, that really means that recognized sources of reporting in the music industry need to have written about the band before this project will retain an article about it. I've done some cursory searching, but cannot find anything that satisfies that requirement; indeed, because there's also no credible claim of significance made here, this could be subject to the project's rapid-deletion policy at the discretion of the administrators (WP:CSD). Should this ultimately be deleted, creation of a redirect to Roman navy would be a matter of editorial discretion, as Roman ships currently redirects to that target. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 14:05, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

That makes sense. Here are few things, possibly helpful. The previous incarnation of this band had more press / notoriety etc. Sinkingsteps Risingeyes. 69.63.8.151 (talk) 15:01, 4 October 2016 (UTC) 21-gattinara-24 (talk) 15:25, 29 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:49, 4 October 2016 (UTC)


 * delete I appreciate the list of sources above, but the only one I think might count as being a reliable source is paste, and that coverage is just too limited. So delete per WP:GNG but please feel free to recreate as more sources become available.  I'm a bit surprised you don't have coverage in local papers given the Paste article.  Some people count those for less, but a nice in-depth article on the band, even in a local paper, would put me on the keep side. Hobit (talk) 12:41, 7 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.