Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roman Webber


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:42, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Roman Webber

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is an MMA fighter that has never fought for a top tier MMA organization and thus fails WP:MMANOT. There's no indication he's notable for anything else and the only source given is for his fight record.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.  —Astudent0 (talk) 17:33, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:04, 9 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Subject clearly fails WP:MMANOT. Papaursa (talk) 05:07, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Another case of a fighter who fails WP:MMANOT. 131.118.229.17 (talk) 18:20, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * weak keep developing fighter. 162.83.194.253 (talk) 21:03, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I see today is your first day posting and you voted keep on a number of AfD discussions. Welcome to Wikipedia, but you might want to brush up on some of Wikipedia's policies.  For example, WP:CRYSTALBALL says a person needs to be notable now, we can't know what the future holds.  A "developing fighter" doesn't sound notable (or like one who's reached the top level of his profession) and he clearly doesn't meet the MMA notability guidelines at WP:MMANOT.  The notability policy WP:N says that articles need significant coverage in independent and reliable sources, and this article also lacks those.  When you vote, it's better if you give reasons (preferably based on WP policies). Papaursa (talk) 01:27, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.