Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romana Bashir


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Killiondude (talk) 07:49, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Romana Bashir

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Spokeswoman with nothing significant in coverage. Fails WP:ANYBIO. Störm  (talk)  07:29, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete another article on a minor Christian from Pakistan. If I did not know better I would think the majority of people in Pakistan are Christians, just because the majority of people we have articles on from there that make any mention to the subjects religion in a meaningful way are on Christians.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:19, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:11, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:11, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:11, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:11, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 06:12, 6 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep I would like to see someone who knows Urdu weigh in here. There is enough indication from what we have in English to show that's she likely notable. She's a women's rights and peace activist. The fact that she's Christian in a majority Muslim country is significant because it makes her a minority voice. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:29, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Based on sources available in English. Thsmi002 (talk) 14:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Sources include in-depth here, a mention here, a paragraph here, half the article here, quote here, a quote here, and there are more, which suggests, overall, that she's an important player for women's rights in a troubled nation.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 00:35, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep I see no evidence the sources within the article were checked before the nom. Also keep per links provided by Tomwsulcer.  Mar4d  ( talk ) 08:00, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment Because she is a representative then such kind of press releases will exist. We need coverage which discusses the individual so we can have an encyclopedic entry. Störm   (talk)  08:32, 10 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.