Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romanesci


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:59, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Romanesci

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Possible hoax, possible neologism - either way, all I know is that there are no references to this thing via google. Ironholds (talk) 04:43, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Hoax. Joe Chill (talk) 16:33, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - incoherent nonsense and a hoax. Bearian (talk) 02:26, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  -- —  æk Talk  02:46, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete – agree that this is probably a hoax. The article creator has also added info on the Romanesci to other articles: . —  æk Talk  02:47, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions.  -- Pcap  ping  01:37, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems like a history lesson, if it's even true, which is quite doubtful.  fetch  comms  ☛ 21:29, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable at best, probable hoax. Edward321 (talk) 18:38, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. The keywords here appear to be unpublished thesis. Pcap ping  19:45, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - not enough significant coverage by reliable third party sources to merit inclusion under notability guidelines.  Cocytus   [»talk«]  22:59, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.