Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romanian Golden Team


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 18:59, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Romanian Golden Team

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Quite simply, the article lacks the "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" needed for retention. Biruitorul Talk 20:47, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose The group has enough notability (14,000 google results). The article can be expanded in the future (Iaaasi (talk) 22:07, 24 January 2011 (UTC))
 * See WP:GHITS for why that's an invalid rationale. Please show actual independent sources that can be used to expand the article, which has been sitting unreferenced for 9 months. - Biruitorul Talk 00:45, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I've added two sources (Iaaasi (talk) 07:37, 25 January 2011 (UTC))
 * Delete per the nomination. I trust the judgement of Biruitorul on this one. If this team were really widely known and notable as a "Golden Team" he as a Romanian editor would surely know about this. Hobartimus (talk) 11:45, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * This is a subjective and weak argument. Notability is not evaluated after a certain editor's knowledge. I don't think Romanian Golden Team is less notable than for example football players from the sixth English divison that owe articles here with no problems(Iaaasi (talk) 11:51, 31 January 2011 (UTC))

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment I don't understand Romanian but some gnews hits appear . LibStar (talk) 12:23, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 19:14, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.