Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romano-German Pontifical


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep (non-admin closure) &mdash; Caknuck 20:38, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Romano-German Pontifical

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This page has no sources and is a questionable article in it's self. Also made by an author who has a history of making nonsense or fake articles. Xtreme racer 19:39, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep - a quick Google, especially Google Scholar finds respectable sources referring to it. I've added one (of the few online). Here is detailed description . But some of the facts about its origin and location need checking. Gordonofcartoon 21:50, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Update: multiple sources and more information added. Gordonofcartoon 11:39, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep, I also must agree with Gordonofcartoon. Callelinea 22:28, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I traced the Krakow/Tyniec bit; it was merely inaccurate. Gordonofcartoon 04:01, 9 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep - After fact checking, it will be perfectly notable. Bart133 (t) (c) 04:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep - article is well sourced. John Vandenberg 16:12, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: The article was originally not sourced at all but it has become apparent that the article is for a valid piece of literature though given the starting author's history suspicion was well founded. Xtreme racer 17:02, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as per above; old saying: even a broken clock gives the correct time twice a day. Bearian 19:12, 11 July 2007 (UTC)Bearian 19:12, 11 July 2007 (UTC) Bearian 19:12, 11 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.