Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romantic forgery

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 16:37, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)

Romantic forgery
Delete. Neologism; 12 Google hits for "romantic forgery". Android79 14:35, Mar 17, 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete, cute but never-used. Philthecow 15:01, Mar 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologism. I hope SamuraiClinton did not create this article on the presumption that widespread usage of the term might someday exist. -- Antaeus Feldspar 17:19, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - trivial content. Charles Matthews 17:48, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article's author, SamuraiClinton, did not cite any credible evidence to what appears to be neologism. Zzyzx11 18:15, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * keep, merge or redirect to a related article. I don't consider this a neologism, because "romantic" and "forgery" are 2 common words; and there is a space between the 2. This by SamuraiClinton, the author of the artice.  Vlad M V  &#1645; talk 05:03, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Neologism disagrees with you. The term can also apply to phrases. Android79 00:49, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * The point is that invented concepts are original research, whether they're represented by one word or several words. Rhobite 15:14, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * delete, trivial and irrelevant neologism - Skysmith 10:22, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, another invented phrase from SamuraiClinton. Rhobite 15:01, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, looks like a phrase invented by a bitter ex. Sad, really, but doesn't belong in an encyclopaedia. --Orelstrigo 18:12, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, bad enough that SamuraiClinton spews myriad articles with non-standard names about trivial topics that can at least be verified, but articles on trivial, invented phrases -- no way. older &ne; wiser 17:43, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per arguments given above. Rossami (talk) 05:51, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologism. Vlad M V  &#1645; talk 05:03, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.