Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romber


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete, consensus is that this is a neologism. Davewild (talk) 16:05, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Romber

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Reason Neologism and not encyclopedic material. Poor Poor Pitiful Me (talk) 00:58, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - It's a definition of a word not encyclopedic. I not even sure the word should exist.PB666 yap 01:03, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 01:09, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete but we do have Brangelina as a redirect, and should burn that too. ThuranX (talk) 01:20, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, can TomKat go too? None of these are remotely encyclopedic. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 02:55, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologism. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 09:07, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.