Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romeo 2013


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Bappy Chowdhury.  Sandstein  21:09, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Romeo 2013

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This film has been tagged for notability ever since created 3 years ago. Sole cited source is merely a credits listing. Searches of the usual types, including by Bengali script name, found: What was not found was any review, analysis, or significant detail in independent, reliable, secondary sources. As such it does not meet WP:GNG. Nor does it meet any criterion of WP:NF. Worldbruce (talk) 01:50, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * one announcement that shooting had begun (in Bengali)
 * a press release for the opening (in Bengali) (reprinted by various outlets)
 * passing mentions that so-and-so had been in it: (in Bengali),, and  (a Bengali version of this story appeared in many other papers, e.g.  and )
 * lists of all movies made in 2013
 * TV listings
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 01:51, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 01:51, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Possible redirect to Bappy Chowdhury due to the film's questionable notability. edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī😎 01:39, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:04, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect or Userfy If this is a produced movie that's been released, even on the 50 screens mentioned, there should be sources. But this stub does not show any meaning it's not ready for Wikipedia.  Redirect per Bappy Chowdhury above, or else just userfy the article until it's creator can improve it. -Markeer 18:39, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'm satisfied with redirect to Bappy Chowdhury as consensus. and later the similarly named  between them created this article and articles on Bappy Chowdhury and the production company Jaaz Multimedia. Until their creating spree petered out in early 2014, they seemed to be on track to create an article on every film ever made by either and on everyone who ever appeared with Bappy. Some of their topics were notable, some were not. I doubt if either is able or likely to improve this, but I have no objection to it being split off into a stand alone article again at some future date, if sources eventually turn up to demonstrate notability. Worldbruce (talk) 19:18, 21 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.