Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romeo Lacoste


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:57, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Romeo Lacoste

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems somewhat promotional and non-notable person. Classicwiki (talk) (ping me please) 16:18, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:19, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:19, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:19, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:20, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:20, 16 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Strong delete - This is not a résumé.Acnetj (talk) 04:59, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep the sources presented are decent; a news search shows many more sources in Forbes and other good pubs. Notability seems to be established. 96.127.242.251 (talk) 02:29, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Notability is not properly established here — none of the sources present in the article are about Lacoste, but rather all simply namecheck his existence briefly within coverage of other people. This is not how you demonstrate a person as notable enough for a Wikipedia article: he needs to be the subject of a source, not merely mentioned in coverage of somebody or something else, before that source counts as a WP:GNG-assisting reference. Bearcat (talk) 22:14, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I looked again. You're right. Striking earlier vote.96.127.242.251 (talk) 07:59, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.