Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rommie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 02:05, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Rommie

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This character does not establish notability independent of its series through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement. TTN (talk) 18:45, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, original research with a healthy dollop of plot summary. Stifle (talk) 20:18, 20 October 2008 (UTC) Keep as improved. Stifle (talk) 08:18, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to List of Andromeda characters. Edward321 (talk) 23:49, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge changed to Keep, see below  is some appropriate place, with a small amount of discussion. As merged, it does not have to show WP:N. As usual on these nominations, no reason for not merging was even suggested. DGG (talk) 00:36, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge with the other Andromeda characters to List of Andromeda characters (which is currently a redirect to the main article). I bet that that notability can be established for at least GA-level, but as usual, once fandom has moved on, fiction articles without already established notability just keep sticking in eternal badness if nothing is done. – sgeureka t•c 07:13, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   -- raven1977 (talk) 21:10, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   -- raven1977 (talk) 21:10, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable character, notable series. Hobit (talk) 00:59, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep-- now is referenced. No need to even consider a merge, now that it meets what people consider the gold standard of GNG. DGG (talk) 02:06, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 00:23, 23 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.