Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romulus Junius Brutus Caepio de Montford

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 14:57, 20 May 2005 (UTC)

Romulus Junius Brutus Caepio de Montford
reads like a hoax page. Google yielded no entries.--Mitsukai 20:49, 13 May 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Page author also created vanity-seeming page Luke Bright with future predictions, that has already been nominated for nonsense deletion. EvilPhoenix


 * Comment:I'm a little concerned about Bobby Milligan, who may be making specious additions to the database. User created article Romulus_Junius_Brutus_Caepio_de_Montford, which has come up for VfD, and Luke Bright, which has been nominated for nonsense deletion. I'm concerned that user may also be represented by IP address 195.172.150.2, which has also been making connections and creating articles (such as Tiberius_Junius_Brutus), and seems to have vandalised Junius_Brutus_Booth in [this] edit. Please be aware, and check carefully any additions. Best regards, EvilPhoenix
 * 'Comment on Comment. You need to read Resolving disputes. You accomplish nothing by complaining about other users here, accept to encourage offtopic personal arguments. ---Isaac R 02:34, 14 May 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete, unverifiable, possible hoax. Megan1967 00:54, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Hoax, 0 Google hits for "Romulus Junius Brutus Caepio Vessey de Montford" Stancel 00:57, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete but I do wish I knew where it came from. Doesn't read like your typical hoax. It's like somebody is channeling the ghost of some 19th century conspiracy buff! ---Isaac R 02:34, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. I'll agree with that.  The writing is excellent, IMHO.  But it appears to be excellent fiction, and not anything we can use, sadly. --Mitsukai 03:03, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Del. This guy can write well but this is a hoax. muriel@pt 11:58, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, context suggests a hoax. Gazpacho 09:59, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Every one of this user's contributions appears to be either a historical hoax or straight vandalism. Algebraist 10:06, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.