Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Branson

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 01:29, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Ron Branson

 * Delete as not notable enough to warrant an encyclopedia entry, --SqueakBox 16:13, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep &mdash; Marginally notable activist. &mdash; RJH 17:12, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree withSqueakBox --Dhanakorn
 * Seems notable enough. So I'll vote keep. I need more evidence if I'm going to change that vote. (I did remove the unencyclopedic contact details, though.) Mgm|(talk) 19:13, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, marginally notable, though some non-notable data (such as "traveled with" someone else) appear. Can someone show evidence that Alert Sheet Publications or Granada Forum are or were significant enough for articles?  If so, this article should probably be kept (and wikified) based on his heading these activities and writing the bill that became the Judicial Accountability Initiative Law.  Barno 19:46, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * What law? It's a blue-sky proposal. --Calton | Talk 00:38, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * KEEP I put this page on Wikipedia and I am being STALKED and HARASSED by SqueakBox. She has repeatedly hijacked pages, violated the 3RR, and is now showing herself to be a Wikipedia Cyber-Stalker by going to each page I submit and vandalizing it or worse. Her claims are bogus and self serving. ==> Agwiii 01:42, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * I is not a women, nor do or hijack pages nor do I break the 3RR rule, --SqueakBox 01:55, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * No coment is necessary. You are a Cyber Stalker and I have asked the PTB to block your stalking. ==> Agwiii 01:59, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Because you have no evidence, --SqueakBox 02:01, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * The stupefying eloquence of your statement that "I is not a woman" speaks for itself, SqueakBox. STOP CYBER-STALKING ME! Stop dog-posting me. Just STOP and go away! ==> Agwiii 02:03, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * I've struck-out this 'keep' because user has voted 'delete' below. &mdash; Davenbelle 08:57, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, a famous entrepreneur. Oh, Ron Branson, sorry. Delete Chris 01:03, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article-creator's action in removing the VfD notice from the page (under cover of an edit marked 'minor') has swung my vote. Mel Etitis  ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 17:49, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * More misinformation, for I certainly DID NOT REMOVE the Vfd. Agwiii 17:53, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * . Mel Etitis ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 18:11, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Correction, there was no intention to delete the Vfd, which was place here in retaliation by a nameless one. Mel, you know I make a very clear statement to that effect, yet you still post your link. What's your point, confromtation? Agwiii  21:08, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * In case you didn't notice, he added that link before you noticed you did delete the VfD notice by mistake and apologized. --cesarb 21:49, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. --Carnildo 20:36, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. "Alert Sheet Publications" gets 4 unique Google hits. RickK 21:39, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Reads like one of the 'Men of Achievement, 1974' sketches from Fist of Fun.-Ashley Pomeroy 21:48, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Cannot be notable because it was not created by a member of the clique. Agwiii 21:50, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * I think that you mean the Cabal. Mel Etitis ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 22:01, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * No, I used the correct word. "When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean -- neither more nor less." (Humpty Dumpty. Through The Looking Glass. Carroll, L. London, 1872) Signed, Agwiii 22:07, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * But not the actual meaning, of course. --Calton | Talk 00:38, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete – not notable. &mdash; Davenbelle 08:50, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Minor-league activist. --Calton | Talk 00:38, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not sufficently notable. -- Dcfleck 12:48, 2005 Apr 12 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.