Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Catalano


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:35, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Ron Catalano

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Article is largely unreferenced and has been for its entire history. Subject doesn't appear to be notable. No significant coverage in any news outlets. The link to what appears to be an official site is actually just an article about Catalano. Does not seem to be notable per WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, or WP:MUSIC. Dismas |(talk) 05:52, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 22 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  →TSU tp* 15:54, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Catalano is quite a notable subject. Have not heard many modern saxophonist who can match his ability — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.1.133.214 (talk) 10:47, 2 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. No media coverage more significant than an article in his alma mater's college newspaper. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:59, 29 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete The subject has no real claim of notability, and there are no reliable sources to help establish any. About the only claim to fame he has is being the claimed recipient of awards.  But not only can I find no reference to this occurring in any reliable source, but the only reference used to support this claim is to a defunct, former non-profit organization, so I can't imagine these supposed awards actually being notable in any way themselves.  Rorshacma (talk) 17:43, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.