Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Gluckman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:09, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Ron Gluckman

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Journalist - writer of no independent note and with no notable awards or associations. Off2riorob (talk) 21:11, 26 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete No secondary coverage. In general people are not notable just for doing their jobs, although as a journalist your name is automatically going to get into print. Steve Dufour (talk) 06:03, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per the reason I gave when I PRODded the article - "Obviously a prolific writer and there are plenty of examples of his writing in notable publications online, but unfortunately I haven't been able to find any secondary coverage that we can use (I had to remove this per WP:BLPSPS as it appears to be self-published by Rolf Potts). The article has been tagged as needing further sources for 18 months and it seems this can't be resolved. Awards are mentioned although it's not specified which, the only award I could verify is this which is not significant enough to meet WP:ANYBIO." January   (talk)  07:58, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Very Weak Keep There are a lot less notable people who have Wikipedia articles. He does need some sort of significant contribution or award to be kept but I vote keep to preserve this article until someone proves that this person doesn't deserve a Wikipedia article. 5dsddddd (talk) 18:21, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.