Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Gray (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Insufficient coverage in reliable sources, as confirmed by the commentators. I will create a courtesy redirect to his party. TerriersFan (talk) 18:36, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Ron Gray
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN. Has never been elected, lead a party that has never held a seat. West Eddy (talk) 22:42, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  — Frankie (talk) 23:00, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  — Frankie (talk) 23:00, 27 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per . --Me-123567-Me (talk) 21:20, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Any past consensus to "keep all leaders of political parties" has long since been overridden by Wikipedia's core requirement that biographies of living persons need to be sourced to the hilt or get canned; there is no "somebody might improve it someday" exemption for BLPs anymore. Keep if the article is improved by close; redirect to the party if it isn't. Notability is a question of the quality of sources that are or aren't present in the article, not a question of blanket "all X are notable" proclamations — if the sources aren't there, then an article does not get to stay. Bearcat (talk) 04:20, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:11, 3 May 2012 (UTC)



Delete per 88.201.63.26 (talk) 17:16, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.