Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Kolm (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 03:06, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Ron Kolm
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:AUTHOR. No notable publications. No major awards LibStar (talk) 17:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment - Did find this award, but I am not familiar with it, and can't say off the bat if it is significant. Some coverage and reviews have me leaning towards keep, but still somewhat on the fence. , , , ,  (I suppose this helps), . Yvarta (talk) 19:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:49, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete the level of coverage is not high enough to justify an article on this writer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:52, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Covered in sources such as Suburban Ambush: Downtown Writing and the Fiction of Insurgency, Concise Companion to Postwar American Literature and Culture and Up is Up, But So is Down: New York's Downtown Literary Scene, 1974-1992. Andrew D. (talk) 19:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * is this indepth coverage? LibStar (talk) 22:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.