Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron McVan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete, A7, G11, WP:SNOW, etc. Chick Bowen 05:35, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Ron McVan

 * — (View AfD)

Notability not established and this article has numerous WP:BLP issues. Unclear if this is a vanity article or an attack article but in either case doesn't appear encyclopedic. Dragomiloff 03:04, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Akihabara 04:04, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. MER-C 04:33, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, it's a nicely begining attack article :) SkierRMH, 08:12, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep If it doesn't appear encyclopedic then Wikipedia is here to do just that. Yes, it does need working on and this will be done by myself and others greatly if you please just give us time. McVan is the MAIN exponent of Wotanism and it extremily notable. It needs working on admittedly but lets do that rather than delete things! FK0071a 17:06, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Baristarim 19:55, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I suppose that Wotanism is notable, but that does not make practitioners thereof notable automatically.--Anthony.bradbury 22:48, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete G11, mainly focuses on attacking subject. And so tagged. Seraphimblade 04:08, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.