Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Nehring


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) czar   &middot;   &middot;  05:00, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Ron Nehring

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is written like an advertisement, has had significant contributions by its subject, has virtually no sources, and the only sources it does have are 1st party. Athene cunicularia (talk) 05:17, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. — Mike  moral  ♪♫  05:27, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. — Mike  moral  ♪♫  05:28, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Keep Although there are problems with the content of the article and the significant contributions by its subject, we usually keep State chairs of the major political parties in the United States. It would be better to completely rewrite the article, but the subject does meet WP:N. Enos733 (talk) 17:36, 4 July 2013 (UTC) 
 * Keep Twice served as chairman of the California Republican Party? Notable. Oodles of coverage in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 00:05, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *poke* 03:05, 12 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep but trim massively. As chair of the California Republican Party he does appear to have attracted significant coverage by multiple independent reliable sources and thus notability (as was apparently the case for his predecessor and successor). However, the unsourced bragging and boosterism in the article need to go. I'll work on that. --MelanieN (talk) 01:57, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * OK, there. I added reliable sources, trimmed most of the puffery and added balance. --MelanieN (talk) 02:33, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.