Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Nehring (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 05:57, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Ron Nehring
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It's been five years since this article was last nominated for deletion, and there hasn't been any significant improvement whatsoever. With the research I've done, there still isn't enough independent sources to help this article pass WP:GNG. Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 07:15, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:26, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:26, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:26, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:26, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. Being organizational chair of a political party is not an automatic inclusion freebie — it can get a person into Wikipedia if they can be reliably sourced as the subject of enough coverage to clear WP:GNG, but it doesn't guarantee them an article just for existing. But two of the three references here are glancing namechecks of his existence as a giver of soundbite in articles about other things or people, and the one that's actually about him is a straight-up press release from the Republican National Committee itself. Which means none of these are notability-supporting sources at all: the two that are reliable aren't about him, and the one that is about him isn't independent. Bearcat (talk) 18:50, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So said The Great Wiki Lord. (talk) 15:28, 29 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.