Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Prichard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. John254 01:31, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Ron Prichard

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Autobiography of a golf course designer. Is he notable? (TehSpud says: "I have seen no evidence that this is an autobio to begin with." How about: "my studies" - twice in this state of the article; "self-made" image and his being an SPA.) -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 11:20, 5 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep While the article could use some work, I am convinced of notability due to Google News hits here http://news.google.com/archivesearch?tab=pn&q=%22Ron+Prichard%22+golf&ie=UTF-8 and this book here that mentions his restoration http://books.google.com/books?id=l4K6G9nSyZMC&pg=PA508&dq=%22Ron+Prichard%22+golf&sig=2-8sL0f6NytgJLZn1Ie736ZPd2A. (Mind meal (talk) 13:49, 5 February 2008 (UTC))


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tikiwont (talk) 09:28, 14 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep per Mind meal. The google news hits in particular look sufficient to support notability.-- Kubigula (talk) 05:06, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:07, 25 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep per Mind meal and Kubigula; the sources show Mr. Prichard meets the primary notability criterion. However, the current content is unsourced and promotional in tone, and should go altogether. I suggest reducing the article to a stub and expanding from the news sources. EALacey (talk) 19:30, 25 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.