Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronald Goldman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. —Quarl (talk) 2007-04-21 09:03Z

Ronald Goldman

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

completely unreferenced. Subject has no notable achievements. Proudlyhumble07 07:29, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep; not notable for any particular achievements, but nevertheless undoubtedly notable. Yes, the article does need refs, but they won't be hard to find. --Trovatore 07:34, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Nowhere in WP:BIO does it state that notability is based on achievements. In fact, one of the main qualifications under WP:BIO is "Wide name recognition". -- Charlene 07:57, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong and Speedy Keep Are you kidding me? This victim was internationally known and still is.  This shouldn't even be nominated. Jmlk17 08:48, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Obvious Keep Possible bad faith nomination.  Pablothegreat85 09:01, 21 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.