Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronald Goldman (psychologist) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:51, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Ronald Goldman (psychologist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I am the article subject's representative. I regard my client as a non-notable, private person, and that I want the article to be deleted. Tbetzold (talk) 16:41, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2020 March 7.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 17:06, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:13, 7 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Procedural Close: The article is poorly and inadequately sourced, no error, but this isn't the proper venue for the request. The nom needs to go to Contact us/Article subjects, where among other things the volunteers will ascertain whether the nom indeed speaks for the subject.   Ravenswing      19:06, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I suggest we keep this discussion open and judge whether the subject is notable enough for an article, which would be what we would do anyways after the subject contacts a volunteer. – Thjarkur (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete – Several very short quotes from him appear in a handful of third party sources but there's no significant coverage of him or his books that I could find.  – Thjarkur (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. – Thjarkur (talk) 00:41, 8 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete no where near meeting any inclusion criteria, so we do not have to determine whether the request is actually connected to the article's subject.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:50, 9 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.