Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronald Gould (mathematician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep per WP:SKCRIT #1 (no valid nomination reason offered), and probably an element of #2 (disruptive nomination made purely to prove a WP:POINT). —— SN  54129  09:45, 14 November 2019 (UTC) (non-admin closure)

There seems to be COI, involved with the creation of this page and the wikipedian who has been editing it.


 * If there are COI issues, that might mean the content of the article needs to be checked but it's not a reason to delete the page as such. What do you think about the subject's notability? Richard Nevell (talk) 22:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment. The format of this AfD has not been properly set up. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:14, 13 November 2019 (UTC).
 * Comment This article is seven years old. The Afd should be signed but expresses no argument for deletion. What does Schlossbergfes want here? This is the work of several editors over the years - would it not be strange to delete it? Victuallers (talk) 23:19, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - I think this is in response to Articles for deletion/Kate Killick today, where the recent editor of Ronald Gould (mathematician) was the first to comment. Other editors just got nastygrams . The dust has now settled. I suggest this be closed as keep and we can all go back to whatever we were doing before this. Ajpolino (talk) 23:26, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a hideous double standard, and judging by the quick reaction to a seemingly unrelated afd, it appears that some of these editors are sock puppets; however, no one is going to listen to my argument, I'm just the feminist who is pointing out hypocrisy. The editior has CLEARLY, met the subject in person, and is a sever COI to the quality of this medium.Schlossbergfes (talk) 09:17, 14 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.