Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronald Jones II


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America1000 03:15, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Ronald Jones II

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unprodded without rationale. Fails WP:NCOLLATH, and doesn't meet WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 02:20, 13 March 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 04:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:08, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:08, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:08, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:08, 21 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. A 1,000 yard rusher and Rose Bowl championship as a sophomore for USC in 2016.  Going into his junior year in the fall of 2017.  Passes WP:GNG by having received significant coverage in multiple, reliable sources.  See, e.g., (1) this, (2) this, and (3) this from Los Angeles Times, (4) this and (5) this from ESPN.com, (6) this from The Oklahoman, (7) this from McKinney Courier-Gazette, (8) this, (9) this, and (10) this from Los Angeles Daily News, and (11) this from the Orange County Register. Cbl62 (talk) 23:26, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:GNG and WP:BASIC, per Cbl62's sources. Ejgreen77 (talk) 10:57, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per the sources provided by Cbl62. Lepricavark (talk) 20:57, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per the sources provided by Cbl62. RCFrance (talk) 23:02, 23 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.