Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronen Har-Zvi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep, deletion rationale has clearly been refuted, no delete votes standing. Non-admin closure. --Pgallert (talk) 21:20, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Ronen Har-Zvi

 * - (|View AfD) (View log)

No reason was given for the nomination, and the original editor who tagged the article for AFD did not actually create this debate. The original tag was made (here) by with the edit summary "article about a total nobody", which might serve as the rationale here. For my part, no opinion on Deletion. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 12:20, 7 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Strong keep. (While I started this page, I did not make the call for deletion.)  GM Har-Zvi easily meets the criteria for notability.  (I just spent 12 hours this week listening to his webcasts.)  Recommend the this entry be edited for NPOV, however: portions read like self-promotion. Billbrock (talk) 20:24, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. (as author) No reason given for deletion. Har-Zvi is notable as Grandmaster of chess.  (talk) 06:53, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:45, 7 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. Meets criteria for notability. Well-sourced, but article needs cleaning up with regard to NPOV. Canals86966 (talk) 12:29, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Procedural Keep While I do feel chess is overrepresented on Wikipedia to a nearly absurd degree, I feel that if all the original nominator could come up with as reasoning was "article about a total nobody", then we really probably should have given it the attention of a full debate. Case dismissed due to lack of evidence, in other words.  Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:04, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep no valid arguement for deletion has been provided.--Cube lurker (talk) 17:14, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep This more than passes WP:BIO. Joal Beal (talk) 19:34, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.