Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roni Lynn Deutch (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Nomination withdrawn per the sources found by, which I took care of inserting into the article. Seriously, though, when we're dealing with a prolific mass-producer of press releases like this, finding reliable sources is like finding a needle in a haystack. Non-admin closing. --  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 00:41, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Roni Lynn Deutch
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Attorney with no evidence of notability. When I tried to prod this article, I found out that it had been deleted four years ago in a discussion tainted by both sides. Although this incarnation fails to address the concerns expressed in the first AfD, IMO 4 years is too long for a G4 speedy. Delete.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 16:46, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sorry Blanchard. I think she is plenty notable, given for instance these search results. She runs a big operation, and there must be an article there that has more than just 'controversies.' Moreover, and I am not sure this was addressed appropriately in the first AfD, she is smoking hot (I'm not a spring chicken anymore), and I think WP:HOTTIE applies. In case you're wondering, yes, my wife thinks I'm a total moron. Drmies (talk) 17:19, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: some of the Google News results are press-releases or material of a similar sort which are not reliable sources. Perhaps there is a source out there which supports the assertion of notability in the article. No recommendation either way at the moment, pending further research. -- Kinu t /c  17:45, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, but there are also plenty of good sources there. The way I see it, a company that big and visible, and gets sued for so much money, is pretty much notable already. Drmies (talk) 17:49, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Much as I hate BLPs based mostly on negative notoriety, she is getting some widespread and mainstream coverage: LA Times, Time, Forbes (blog). In addition to the lawsuits against her, the Forbes blog point out that she is notable because "Deutch gets a fair amount of free air time as a “tax expert” on such networks as Time Warner’s CNN and GE’s NBC." First Light (talk) 19:25, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:43, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:43, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.