Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronnie Letham


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 02:14, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Ronnie Letham

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Created by a verified sock noted for hoaxes, this might not be one, as there are two obituaries which appear to reliably verify his existence. I'm not sure that that rises, however, to notability, and is it completely insane that I'm starting to wonder about the obits? Perhaps. j⚛e deckertalk 18:58, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:CSD and WP:EVADE. The other editors of the article have not added substantial content.- MrX 19:15, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
 * You appear to be correct. --j⚛e deckertalk 19:31, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I also agree.  Arfæst Ealdwrítere   (talk)  23:31, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'm not too solid on this one to make a firm judgment at the moment, but his IMDb page shows that he has a decent filmography about him in terms of numbers. The most important role I'm seeing, however, is on the short-lived Atletico Partick. But he is a real guy with some real roles. ö   Brambleberry   of   RiverClan  19:17, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm slightly more convinced by that he exists than by IMDB, I've at least one memorable hoax unmasking where content had gotten introduced into IMDB.  (That one was funnier.)  In any case, yes, I think that an actor by that name exists.  --j⚛e deckertalk 19:30, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - IMDB is not considered to be a reliable source as it comprises information which is user submitted.  Arfæst Ealdwrítere   (talk)  23:34, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: Precisely: WP:RS/IMDB. --j⚛e deckertalk 06:18, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 21 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment This isn't a hoax per this, this and this. I'm not going to add the refs until the block/evade issue is resolved but I don't think that it qualifies under G5 as the page was created on March 7 while AFAICT the block occurred later. Philg88 ♦talk 06:14, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm not sure I agree as a matter of textual interpretation, G5 refers to blocked users, not blocked accounts, and many of this user's socks, which have been confirmed by CU, have been indef blocked for 3+ years. However, there may be a precedent on this point that I am unaware of.  --j⚛e deckertalk 06:20, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment' I have temporarily pulled the G5 tag while we turn to notability, etc. I do agree that some of the material is true, as I've stated above, IMDB didn't convince me, but I doubt the Mirror report is fabricated. --j⚛e deckertalk 06:27, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Good call. I'm not sure how the sock issue will turn out but I'm going to collect some more references if I can find them and see whether notability can be established. Philg88 ♦talk 08:13, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Comment without prejudice to the block/sock issue I believe Letham probably passes individual/actor notability based on the existing article reference to The Scotsman and the following:
 * Reliable source, 330 word obituary.
 * Reliable source, 330 word obituary.


 * Reliable source, 81 word vignette.
 * Reliable source, 81 word vignette.


 * Reliable source, passing mention in theatre review.
 * There are also multiple mentions of him in a Google Book search as a cast member, while News has seven mentions.
 * There are also multiple mentions of him in a Google Book search as a cast member, while News has seven mentions.

In summary, three strong references and, per actor notability guideline, confirmation of significant roles in multiple notable television shows and stage performances. Philg88 ♦talk 08:52, 21 June 2014 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 04:06, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔   14:35, 8 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Just about meets WP:GNG: there's the articles in the Scotsman and Herald plus other shorter mentions. Google Books throws up several sources in snippet view, including a Spectator review of a play he directed, Joyce McMillan's book about the Traverse Theatre, and several other critical notices. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:01, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.