Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rooftop Films


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 08:39, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Rooftop Films

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I nominated this for speedy deletion back in 2014. It was declined for making a credible claim of significance, but even now I cannot see how this passes WP:NCORP. I don't believe this subject was ever notable enough to have deserved an article. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 05:56, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:18, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:18, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:18, 24 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Most of the sources are dead links to the official website or blogs. There's two other references with titles like Where to Watch Outdoor Summer Movies in Brooklyn and The Must-See Movies and Venues at Rooftop Films in Brooklyn and contain little significant coverage or passing mentions. I can't find anything to satisfy WP:ORGDEPTH. Dylsss(talk &bull;&#32;contribs) 19:35, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Wasn't able to find those sources, but there's enough depth below in my opinion. Dylsss(talk &bull;&#32;contribs) 02:55, 2 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep. The sources in the article are lacking, but there are plenty in-depth sources available:




 * Courtesy ping  czar  18:23, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Needs evaluation of sources provided: do they provide WP:ORGDEPTH?

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, (t &#183; c)  buidhe  09:43, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep in view of the additional multiple reliable sources coverage identified in this discussion that show a pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:21, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep thanks to Czar's identified sources. — Toughpigs (talk) 23:45, 1 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.